The Value of Manuscripts

It happens rarely – but it does happen.  People steal manuscripts, autographs, stamps, seals, maps and illustrations from libraries.  Last July, Barry Landau, author of The President’s Table: Two Hundred Years of Dining and Diplomacy (2007), was caught with an accomplice, Jason Savedoff, stealing documents from the Maryland Historical Society.  Since then, police have found about 10,000 documents in their apartment.

‘I cannot believe it,’ Lynn von Furstenberg, the second wife of Prince Egon von Furstenberg and a close friend of Landau’s for many years, told The Daily Beast. ‘The things I’ve been reading about him in the press are not the Barry I know. He’s just this gregarious, sweet, sensitive human being.’

Well yes, maybe.  On Amazon, Landau is described as a ‘historian’ – but as those of us in the profession well know, anyone can call themselves a historian.  There’s no quality control outside the university system, and since non-academic historians do a lot of important work, I don’t really want any – but sometimes someone goes rogue.

Working in archives, in major libraries, or small institutions such as the Maryland Historical Society, historians often have access to very valuable items – and for some people the temptation can be overwhelming.  I remember hearing many years ago about a university lecturer who was caught stealing 19th century stamped envelopes from the British Library.  He collected stamps, so knew what items to look for.  He came from a ‘good’ background and the whole affair was hushed up – so successfully that he got a Chair at an Australian university that undoubtedly knew nothing about his background.

Every library has a security problem, and as the value of items rises, the chance rises that rare books will be pilfered for their maps and pictures, or autograph letters and envelopes will disappear out the door, concealed in folders of notes.

Libraries fight back, of course.  At the British Library, and similar libraries, you can only take things into the reading rooms inside clear plastic bags, and most repository libraries have metal detectors, though security people are mainly concerned with keeping dangerous items out, rather than keeping precious items in.

In manuscript rooms, security is higher still.  I remember visiting Southampton University library to read a section of Lord Shaftesbury’s diary.  Before they handed me the volume, they weighed it, and weighed it again when I returned it.  Apparently this is standard procedure in manuscript libraries, but most do it out of sight of the readers.  Southampton decided that doing it publically was a more effective deterrent.  (In case you are thinking of replacing a few pages of A4 in the folio, it is very hard to get the substitute weight exactly right.)

Fencing these thefts is relatively easy with EBay and the like.  Many of these thieves are not interested in the money though, or not just the money.  Like the stamp collector in the British Library, often they are collectors who see the concrete objects in front of them, and recognize their intrinsic value.  Where we historians tend to see only the words on the page, they see the page itself.

Meanwhile the relationship between philately and history cuts both ways.  Many years ago, I spent a lot of time working on the letters of Florence Nightingale in the British Library.  I’m not sure when, and how, these letters arrived in the library, but before they did, somebody tore off the stamps, no doubt so that some child could stick them in a stamp album.  Where the stamp was on an envelope, this didn’t matter a great deal (though it would to someone wanting to know when and where they were posted), but many letters were folded and sealed, with the address and stamp intrinsic to the letter.  When the stamp was torn away, it left a gap in the letter itself.

On the other hand, many letters only survive because of the enthusiasm of stamp collectors.  In 2006 the Mitchell Library in Sydney bought 10 letters written in Australia by ‘David’ in 1920, and posted to Mrs Dudley Ward in England.  A Canadian philatelist bought them, presumably because of their high value Australian stamps, but they hadn’t been read and their significance wasn’t recognized, until someone recognized the name ‘Dudley Ward’.   In 1920, the Prince of Wales, Edward Albert Christian George Andrew Patrick David – known to his family and friends as David – visited Australia, from where he sent passionate letters to his mistress, Winifred (Freda) Dudley Ward, the wife of a British MP.  Freda never spoke of her long affair with the Prince, and who knows how those letters came to be in Canada, but without a stamp collector, they might have disappeared long ago.

For historians like me, the words on the page are what matters, not the page itself.  I’ve no desire to collect stamps or autographs or old maps, but I recognize that some people do, so it is wonderful when honest collectors make their collections available digitally – as here and here, for instance.

Meanwhile I’m happy to read digitized versions of documents when they are available.  Though I am sad that this will make visits to overseas libraries less necessary in the future, it certainly makes research a lot cheaper and more accessible.

I still can’t make my mind up about one thing.  Since we know that an illicit market for valuable items exists, and since libraries and archives hold such tempting collections of these items, should they judiciously sell off some of their originals?  Every historical instinct screams NO, but perhaps releasing lots of copies of Florence Nightingale’s signature on to the market would depress its value, and make theft less likely.  Your thoughts?

This time last year:
White Collar Work: doing the laundry, 10 February 2011

About these ads

7 responses to “The Value of Manuscripts

  1. Good thought Marion, but you are never going to get rid of bad habits, most people ARE honest, but for others the thrill of ‘nicking’ something and getting away with it (not to mention making a HUGE profit) is just too tempting. Thanks for giving our link, we are always happy for people to read our old letters.
    Best wishes
    Eunice

    • Thank you Eunice and Dumbadmin. You both agree that theft won’t stop, it will just move from targeting public rather than private owners. And I guess that public institutions should be better able to protect their holdings. I’m always outraged at what happens to stuff in private hands – destroyed to get insurance money, for instance, or held in bank vaults where nobody can see them.

  2. InterInteresting question which has no simple answer. Digitalisation of valuable manuscripts should be seen as part of the preservation process where the anolog copy is maintained by the host institution. Yes, the argument is there that a digital copy negates the need for the original but this overlooks the historic value of the manuscript per se.

    The move to private ownership will not reduce the incidence of theft just from whom it is stolen from. Very determined collectors will always find a means of possessing an object.

    Your question brings into question the role of the library and archives. National institutions are seen as cultural bastion yet the argument is being made that because an item has a monetary value it should not be held by public/quasi-public institutions as it might be stolen.

    Whenever a library weeds its collection there is general outrage (http://www.smh.com.au/technology/technology-news/books-get-the-shove-as-university-students-prefer-to-do-research-online-20110307-1bl8b.html) so what criteria would be used to determine which manuscripts are harvested for profit. Value is a nebulous concept but it seems there will be the risk that the economist will triumph over the historian.

  3. Thank you for telling us this story. I did not know this. I also liked the “David” tale. Still, it is shocking to think of someone doing this, “historian” or not. I am glad to have found your blog.

  4. Also, thank you for the links in your “Useful stuff for historians.” I did not know about Yale’s online resources, for example.

  5. Pingback: Historians and Philatelists | Historians are Past Caring

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s